[Ppnews] Califas - New Corcoran Hunger Strike
Political Prisoner News
ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Sat Dec 31 18:07:02 EST 2011
<http://prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/update-from-the-pelican-bay-short-corridor/>Update
from the Pelican Bay Short Corridor
Prisoners at Corcoran Administrative Segregation
Unit Challenge the CDCR & Advance Prisoners Struggles
Posted on
<http://prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/prisoners-at-corcoran-administrative-segregation-unit-challenge-the-cdcr-advance-prisoners-struggle/>December
30,
2011<http://prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity.wordpress.com/author/prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity/>
Prisoners in the Administrative Segregation Unit
(ASU) at Corcoran State Prison
<http://sfbayview.com/2011/new-hunger-strike-petition-for-improved-conditions-in-administrative-segregation-unit-at-corcoran-state-prison/>issued
a petition listing 11 demands
for reform to the CA Department of Corrections &
Rehabilitation (CDCR). The prisoners explained to
CDCR officials on December 19th that the petition
serves as a notice of a peaceful protest if these
demands are not met in a timely manner. CA
hunger strike supporters, prisoner advocates and
family members were informed today that prisoners
at Corcoran began refusing meals on Dec. 28th.
Supporters are currently trying to get more
information, and will send out another update as soon as possible.
*********************************************
<http://sfbayview.com/2011/new-hunger-strike-petition-for-improved-conditions-in-administrative-segregation-unit-at-corcoran-state-prison/>New
hunger strike: Petition for improved conditions
in Administrative Segregation Unit at Corcoran State Prison
December 30, 2011
by Pyung Hwa Ryoo, Juan Jaimes and William E. Brown
http://sfbayview.com/2011/new-hunger-strike-petition-for-improved-conditions-in-administrative-segregation-unit-at-corcoran-state-prison/
(Written Dec. 19, 2011) To: California Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation Director
Matthew Cate, P.O. Box 942883, Sacramento, CA
94283-0001, and Chief Deputy Warden C. Gipson,
Corcoran State Prison, P.O. Box 8800, Corcoran, CA 93212
Mr. Cate and Mrs. Gipson:
We, inmates currently housed in Administrative
Segregation Unit (ASU) of CSP (California State
Prison) Corcoran, hereby petition California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Director Matthew Cate and Corcoran State Prison
Chief Deputy Warden C. Gipson for the redress and
reform of current inhumane conditions we are
subjected to which violate our constitutional rights.
Furthermore, this petition will serve as a
constructive notice for the peaceful protest
which will be carried out as an alternative means
of petition in the event that our conditions and
demands are not met in a timely manner. [A
notation on the cover letter to this petition
says the hunger strike started Dec. 28, 2011.]
Petitioners have attempted to address the issues
brought up in this petition by filing numerous
inmate appeals and grievances and requests for
interviews to no avail. Our constitutional rights
under the First, Fifth and 14th Amendments are
being violated by CDCR and CSP Corcoran officials
and therefore we demand the following:
Demand No. 1: THAT INMATES HERE IN ASU BE ALLOWED TO POSSESS TVs AND/OR RADIOS
We are daily being subjected to sensory
deprivation which imposes a substantial risk of
serious harm to our mental health. As established
in numerous scientific studies, prolonged
subjection to sensory deprivation has serious
adverse effects to ones mental health. We are
subjected to these conditions for months and even
years. Our numerous attempts to address this
problem by filing 602s are being shut down. The
officials are acting with deliberate indifference
to our health and well-being, and our Eighth
Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment is being violated.
Although mandated by a court order to allow
inmates in ASUs to possess an entertainment
appliance, CSP Corcoran officials refuse to do so
citing a memorandum dated Dec. 15, 2008, that
permanently exempts a number of prisons,
including CSP Corcoran, from having to comply
with the courts mandates due to their current
fiscal situation and costs to retrofit housing
units. This policy is illegal, for our
constitutional rights must be protected
regardless of CSP Corcorans financial problems
or the costs to make necessary installations to protect those rights.
Also, the aforementioned exemption memo states
that CSP Corcoran is permanently exempt from
allowing the use of entertainment appliances in
the ASU. The only explanation provided on how and
why this prison is exempt is a brief mention of
the current fiscal situation of the prison. There
is no mention of any follow-ups in a set period
of time e.g., every six months in which the
prisons budget will be reviewed by the Division
of Adult Institutions to see whether the prison
still qualifies for the category that justifies exemption.
In other words, once a prison passes the test
by showing that they currently cannot afford the
costs to retrofit the housing units and get
accepted in the exemption list, that prison is
permanently exempt regardless of their financial
situation in the future. This exemption policy is
clearly unreasonable, and we assert that this
policy is merely used as a loophole to get around
the courts mandates to allow us our entertainment appliances.
Furthermore, the exemption memo cannot apply to
us because there is no extensive retrofitting
required for giving us our radios. The electric
outlets are in place and the radios merely need
to be distributed and plugged in to work.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) CSP Corcoran officials immediately allow us to
possess and/or stipulate to allow us to possess our TVs within two months.
B) CSP Corcoran officials make the necessary
installations and/or stipulations needed to allow
us to possess our TVs within two months.
Demand No. 2: THAT WE ARE PROVIDED ACCESS TO AN
ADEQUATE LAW LIBRARY AND/OR LEGAL ASSISTANCE
The ASU law library is inadequate. Its contents
do not comply with CCR (California Code of
Regulations) Title 15 §3121 and DOM (Department
Operations Manual) §53060.11. There is only one
computer that contains the only essential law
books in the law library, which is supposed to be
shared by 200 inmates. This results in
unreasonable delays with inmates not being able
to sufficiently access the law library.
There is only one computer that contains the only
essential law books in the law library, which is
supposed to be shared by 200 inmates.
Furthermore, there is no copy machine in the ASU
law library. All our legal copies are therefore
forwarded to the 4A facility law library for
copying. This results in delays of days or even
weeks for us to receive our copies back. Also,
there have been instances where our copies have
been lost resulting from this unreliable practice.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) CSP Corcoran officials allow us access to an
adequate law library and reasonable amount of
time to use such law library by: 1) Ordering and
replacing all current law books listed in CCR
Title 15 §3121 and DOM §53060.11 which are
missing from the ASU law libraries contents, or
2) Installing three more computers that contain
essential law books for inmate use, or 3)
Providing us with adequate legal assistance from persons trained in the law.
B) CSP Corcoran officials install a copy machine
in the ASU law library for its use for legal
copies and all essential legal supplies be kept in stock.
Demand No. 3: THAT INMATES NOT BE FURTHER
PUNISHED UPON COMPLETION OF THEIR SHU TERMS
Inmates are being placed in the ASU after the
completion of their SHU terms supposedly pending
transfer. These inmates are then stuck here for
four, five months, in many instances even longer,
before finally being transferred to general
population. This practice of illegally placing
inmates in ASU upon the completion of their SHU
terms for long periods of time without proper
procedure and with excessive delays on their
transfers is resulting in unjustified punishment for these inmates.
Furthermore, inmates undergoing the DRB
(Departmental Review Board) process after the
completion of their SHU terms are being held in
ASU for months and even years while the
counselors and committee ignore their repeated
requests for a timely hearing on their case. This
is in blatant violation of their procedural due process rights.
Inmates undergoing the DRB (Departmental Review
Board) process after the completion of their SHU
terms are being held in ASU for months and even
years while the counselors and committee ignore
their repeated requests for a timely hearing on their case.
The inmates submit numerous inmate requests to
ASU counselors regarding the delays on their
transfers and/or DRB process, but those inmate
requests are not being responded to and are being
ignored. The counselors are not doing their jobs
because of their incompetence and/or negligence;
we are suffering these undue delays explained above.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) The counselors here in ASU do not unreasonably
delay inmates transfers and DRB process and
respond to inmate requests in a timely manner.
B) Inmates who are placed in ASU after the
completition of their SHU terms be afforded the
same privileges as those inmates who are
classified as A2-B inmates, which includes but is
not limited to quarterly packages, one phone call
per month and $120 monthly canteen draws.
Demand No.4: THAT WE BE AFFORDED ADEQUATE AND TIMELY MEDICAL CARE
Medical staff here in ASU unjustifiably delays
medical attention and denies proper medical
treatment for inmates. Although required by the
courts order in Coleman/Plata v. Schwarzenegger
to provide us with adequate medical care, which
the CDCR has failed to provide before, CSP
Corcorans medical department is not in
compliance with the courts mandates. We are
suffering violations to our Eighth Amendment
rights daily for lack of adequate medical care,
and our health and well-being are severely jeopardized.
Furthermore, we are having difficulties pursuing
timely medical appeals and grievances. The
medical appeals coordinators do not follow time
requirements set forth in CCR Title 15 §3084.6
and there are substantial delays on getting responses for our appeals.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) Inmates be provided with timely medical
attention upon request and provided with adequate
medical care as mandated by the court in Coleman/Plata v. Schwarzenegger.
B) Medical appeals be promptly responded to pursuant to CCR Title 15 §3084.6.
Demand No. 5: THAT WE BE AFFORDED DUE PROCESS IN OUR 115 HEARINGS
We are being placed in ASU and sentenced to SHU
terms without being afforded due process of law.
The hearing officers automatically find inmates
guilty regardless of the sufficiency or
insufficiency of the evidence, and their biased
perspectives and opinions go unchallenged.
Although the hearing officers are acting as
lawyers and/or triers of fact in 115 hearings on
the question of guilt, clearly under the
guidelines of established case law concerning due
process, they are not required to be trained in
the law nor registered with the State Bar.
Resulting from their lack of knowledge and
competence in this matter, frivolous and false
charges not supported by any reliable evidence,
which would be thrown out in a court of law, are
being upheld and imposed on us. This violates our
14th Amendment rights to due process.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) Hearing officers be required to follow
guidelines established by the courts concerning
due process, burden of proof and sufficiency of
evidence when conducting 115 hearings.
B) Hearing officers be trained in the law so they
may be deemed competent to carry out the duty of
a trier of fact in 115 hearings.
Demand No. 6: THAT WE BE ALLOWED PHONE ACCESS
Inmates placed in ASU are not allowed access to
phones. The only way we are allowed to maintain
family and community ties are by writing letters
and receiving visits. Not all of us are literate,
and not all of us get visits. So the denial of
phone access is depriving many of us of the only
way to keep in contact with our families and loved ones.
The denial of phone access is depriving many of
us of the only way to keep in contact with our families and loved ones.
Furthermore, those of us currently litigating
cases who need access to the phone to contact
witnesses, private investigators, attorneys,
courtroom clerks etc. are not allowed phone
access. This results in an impingement on our
First Amendment rights to access to the courts.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) Inmates in ASU be allowed one phone call a
month on an inmate telephone pursuant to CCR Title 15 §3282(a)(3).
B) Inmates in ASU be allowed confidential calls
pursuant to CCR Title 15 §3282(g).
Demand No. 7: THAT WE BE PROVIDED WITH ADEQUATE LAUNDRY EXCHANGE
We are being denied adequate laundry exchange.
There are weeks where laundry exchange is not
run; most of the time during laundry exchange
they are short on pillow cases, sheets and
towels; and we are only allowed to turn in one of
each item for laundry exchange. This clearly is
not in accordance with CCR Title 15 §3031(b).
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) We be provided with a weekly laundry exchange
pursuant to CCR Title 15 §3031(b).
Demand No. 8: THAT OUR CANTEEN FOOD ITEMS BE GIVEN TO US IN THEIR PACKAGING
Our canteen is being opened and food items such
as rice, soups, cookies, chips, beans, etc. are
being placed in paper bags before theyre given
to us. This attracts ants and insects that go
into the bags containing food and thereby pose a
serious health risk. Furthermore, the food
becomes stale and inedible after a few days due
to the food being placed in paper bags.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) Inmates be allowed to keep their canteen items
in the plastic bags they come in and/or be
allowed to purchase zip lock plastic bags from
the canteen to place the food in.
Demand No. 9: THAT WE BE AFFORDED EDUCATIONAL AND
REHABILITATIVE PROGRAMS AND/OR OPPORTUNITIES
Inmates in ASU are not allowed any educational
and/or rehabilitative programs and/or
opportunities. There is no school; we are not
allowed to receive any form of correspondence
course for lack of proctors, those of us who wish
to learn a trade are not able to and those of us
who wish to better ourselves to be better
individuals of benefit to our society and other
citizens are not given that chance.
Inmates in ASU are not allowed any educational
and/or rehabilitative programs and/or opportunities.
Furthermore, we are currently not allowed TVs, so
we are not able to partake in educational
opportunities by watching educational channels or
programs or participating in educational programs
that are provided by the institution on the institutional channels.
This contradicts what CDCR supposedly stands for,
which is to make the communities safer and
rehabilitate our prisoners. We wish to better
ourselves by participating in educational and/or
rehabilitative programs, but we are denied this right.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) We are afforded educational programs such as
correspondence courses, proctored exams, vocational courses etc.
B) We are afforded rehabilitative programs in
self-help, Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous etc.
C) We be allowed to possess our TVs for
educational purposes such as to partake in
educational opportunities provided by the
institutional as well as educational channels.
Demand No. 10: THAT WE RECEIVE THE SAME PRIVILEGES AS SHU INMATES
The inmates housed in the SHU are allowed certain
privileges and items from canteen and packages
that we are not allowed. These privileges include
but are not limited to TVs; educational courses;
beanies, sweats and shoes from package; photo
ducats; and art supplies from canteen such as
colored pens, pastels and sketch pads.
Furthermore, SHU inmates are allowed exercise
equipment in the yard cages, such as pull-up and dip bars.
Inmates housed here in ASU are D1/D assigned,
same as the SHU inmates. Most of us are stuck in
this ASU for months and even years. The fact that
we currently are not afforded the same rights and
privileges as SHU inmates violates our equal protection rights.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) We be afforded the same rights, privileges,
items and programs as are afforded to inmates in the SHU
Demand No. 11: THAT NO REPRISALS BE TAKEN FOR THE
EMPLOYMENT OF OUR RIGHT TO PETITION
We are exercising our legal right to petition in
participating in a peaceful protest. This right
is protected by the United States Constitution
and thereby any sanctions and/or reprisals placed
on us for the reason stated above is illegal and a violation of our rights.
THEREFORE, WE DEMAND THAT:
A) No reprisals be taken on petitioners in any
form or manner for the exercise of our right to petition.
Conclusion
We petitioners are not deprived of our
constitutional rights simply because we are
incarcerated behind these prison walls. We are
bound by the Constitution of the United States,
and therefore its protection extends to us as
well. These rights have been violated and
disregarded by CDCR and CSP Corcoran officials
and therefore petitioners, with the support of
members of their class, hereby come together to
demand the redress and remedies that have been long overdue.
We are bound by the Constitution of the United
States, and therefore its protection extends to us as well.
Petitioners pray that this petition and the
issues addressed herein are remedied and the
relief sought in each demand granted.
Pyung Hwa Ryoo, F-88924, Corcoran State Prison,
ASU 1-167, P.O. Box 3456, Corcoran, CA 93212
Juan Jaimes, V-08644, Corcoran State Prison, ASU
1-165, P.O. Box 3456, Corcoran, CA 93212
William E. Brown, T-58106, Corcoran State Prison,
ASU 1-169, P.O. Box 3456, Corcoran, CA 93212
This petition was sent to S. Vargas to be
forwarded to the Bay View. It was typed by Kendra
Castaneda. Readers are urged to write to these brothers on hunger strike.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20111231/8cda1590/attachment.htm>
More information about the PPnews
mailing list