[News] Toward Reconstruction of the Mapuche Nation
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue Nov 17 12:39:06 EST 2009
Toward Reconstruction of the Mapuche Nation
Raúl Zibechi | November 13, 2009
Translated from:
<http://ircamericas.org/esp/6567>Hacia la reconstrucción de la nación mapuche
Translated by: Monica Wooters
Americas Program, Center for International Policy (CIP)
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/6574?utm_source=streamsend&utm_medium=email&utm_content=7279311&utm_campaign=Toward%20Reconstruction%20of%20the%20Mapuche%20Nation
Tired of waiting for the slow transfer of lands
from the state and the always problematic
recognition of their rights, dozens of Mapuche
communities have begun to mobilize, a process
that the Chilean government has responded to with extreme harshness.
Thousands of Mapuches arrived at midday on Oct.
22 at the Municipal Council in Temuco (capital of
the Araucanía, 700 kilometers south of Santiago)
to denounce the violence used by police when they
shot pellet at children. "After arriving in the
center of the city, a group of Mapuche children
from the community of Ercilla opened a sack that
contained the remnants of over 200 tear gas
canisters, cartridges, and police issue bullet
shells," according to the Azkintuwe newspaper.1
The protest, organized by the Mapuche Territorial
Alliance (Alianza Territorial Mapuche), had as
its objective to refute the claim that no
children had been wounded during the intervention
of police forces in the zone. The lonko (Mapuche
authority) Juan Catrillanca, pointed out that in
a police raid, seven children from the local
school were wounded by pellets and as a result
they coordinated this march that is watched over by a strong police contingent.
"We are not afraid of the Chilean State and its
use of violence, our path continues toward the
national liberation of the Mapuche. We know that
we will continue resisting in our communities,"
said Mijael Carbone, werken (director) of the Alliance, to the crowd.
"We are all here, the wounded children are here.
We can all see them. My son Pablo is here with
just one eye, the mothers of the babies that were
gassed one week ago in Temucuicui are here.
Carlos Curinao, brutally beaten by the police the
same day is here. None of them received proper
medical attention. We have come peacefully to
demand respect one more time," stated Catrillanca.2
Despite the fact that the authorities deny it,
both the church and international organizations
have confirmed that children were wounded by
pellets. Gary Stahl, representative of UNICEF in
Chile, was very clear when he said: "In order to
ensure that another generation of Chileans is not
marked by violence, we need to know what has
happened, and find a solution so that this does
not repeat in the future."3 On Oct. 5 a
14-year-old child from the Rofué community was
shot, arrested, loaded into a helicopter, beaten,
and tied up by police forces who threatened to
throw him out of the helicopter once they were in
the air if he did not agree to give the names of
those who participated in the takeover of the Santa Lucía estate.
Human rights organizations have provided dozens
of cases from the last two years in which minors
were shot with pellets and beaten by the local
police as well as militarized police in Chile.
"As of today we have not seen one impartial
investigation to uncover the truth of what
happened," added Stahl after demanding, on behalf
of Unicef, that the administration of President
Michelle Bachelet take measures to ensure the
protection of Mapuche children.4 The indignation
overcame ethnic barriers that week when the
minister of the Interior accused the Mapuche
parents of using their children as "shields" in
their taking of lands. The statement provoked a
wave of anger across the country from south to north.
Land and Poverty in the Araucanía
Poverty levels in Chile reached 22.7% of the
population; however, among indigenous peoples it
has reached 35.6%. Indigenous families earn
nearly half the income that non-indigenous
families do. Education among indigenous people is
2.2 years less than the national average of 9.5
years and just 3% of the rural Mapuche population
has received any secondary education by the age
of 15. Just 41% of indigenous households have
access to sewer systems and 65% have electricity.
Infant mortality rates in some indigenous
municipalities are 50% higher than the national average.5
The human development index among the Mapuche
population is less than the non-indigenous
population (0.642 to 0.736). The lowest indices
in the country are found in the rural areas of
the Araucanía (the Mapuche territory south of Bio
Bio) at 0.549, but the Mapuche woman has an even
lower index of 0.513. In addition to being poor,
they are discriminated against, "almost
completely in the media and in particular in
television,"6 for example. The Mapuche have no representation in Parliament.
However, the state has stood up to an active
policy in favor of indigenous peoples and the
Mapuche in particular. The National Corporation
for Indigenous Development (CONADI, Corporación
Nacional de Desarrollo Indígena) through the Fund
for Indigenous Lands and Water (Fondo de Tierras
y Aguas Indígenas), has transferred some 200,000
hectares to the Mapuche since 1994, benefiting
more than 10,000 families. The numbers are
insufficient as it is estimated that 200,000 more
acres should also be appropriated. Additionally,
many of the families have received individual
titles, not communal ones. The process is very
slow, leaving out many communities, and there are
no support programs in place.7
Among the Mapuche there are many complaints in
regard to the fact that none of the official
programs have consulted with the communities. An
evaluation of state policies in 2003 resulted in
the special rapporteur from the UN Human Rights
Council, Rodolfo Stavenhagen, concluding that
"despite having produced important advances
during the last 10 years, these [people] continue
to live in a situation of marginalization and
negation that keeps them separate from the rest of the country."8
The situation has worsened due to the impressive
expansion of tree plantations throughout southern
Chile for the past three decades. In 1960, each
Mapuche family had an average of 9.2 hectares
even though the state maintained that they needed
50 hectares to live decently. Between 1979 and
1986 each family had just 5.3 hectares, which has
since shrunk to a mere three hectares of land per
family. Under the Chilean dictatorship the
Mapuche lost 200,000 of the 300,000 hectares that
they were conserving. The advancement of tree
plantations and hydroelectric plants on their
lands has caused an exponential increase in poverty and emigration rates.
Currently there are two million hectares of
monoculture tree plantations in the Araucanía in
the hands of three large companies. The Mapuche
lands in their entirety do not amount to 500,000
hectares, where some 250,000 community members
live in 2,000 reservations, tiny islands in a sea
of pines and eucalyptus. "Seventy percent of the
Mapuche territorial entities are directly
affected by environmental impacts caused by the
penetration of tree plantation companies," that
alter the ecosystem, as now "the artificial
forest dries up estuaries and wells, isolates
them geographically, and contaminates the soil,"
according to researcher Juan Calbucura.9
Children at the Center of the Conflict
In response to this scenario, the communities
have been engaged in a constant struggle to
recuperate their ancestral lands that belonged to
them just 20 or 30 years ago. That struggle
clashes with the interests of the large tree
plantation companies and the Chilean State that
supports them. The result is growing
militarization in the most active communities.
This year an important growth in Mapuche activism took place.
In July a hundred or more delegates from the
communities sent a letter to President Bachelet
that was interpreted as a kickoff of a major
process of land recuperation. In August, Jaime
Facundo Mendoza, a Mapuche leader, was killed
when the Special Operations Group evicted dozens
of families from a piece of land they had
recuperated in the Ercilla zone. The funeral was
impressive: it took place over four days and was
attended by thousands of community members from
all over the Araucanía, especially those from the
recently created Mapuche Territorial Alliance
that brings together between 60 and 120 communities.
But other groups attended as well, such as the
Council of All Lands (Consejo de Todas las
Tierras) that became known in 1990, and the more
radical Arauco Malleco Coordination (Coordinadora
Arauco Malleco), created in 1998 that recently
declared war against the Chilean State. But,
above all there were dozens of cultural
associations, traditional authorities, university
students, and the Nationalist Mapuche Wallmapuwen
Party (Partido Nacionalista Mapuche Wallmapuwen).
On Oct. 12 some 10,000 people demonstrated in
Santiago in a protest organized by Meli Wixan
Mapu, an urban Mapuche organization. The biggest
protest in Chile in the last few years attracted
a wide array of indigenous and social groups. A
sign of the times as well as a sign of the
prestige of the Mapuche struggle, Garra Blanca,
the fan base for the Santiago soccer club Colo
Colo, was in attendance waving their flags in the
Alameda (Santiago's main avenue) along with
Mapuche flags and banners referring to the
conflict and denouncing the official celebrations
of the bicentennial anniversary of Chile's independence.10
This is one of the highlighted characteristics of
the current stretch of the Mapuche conflict: the
growing participation of the winkas (whites) in
solidarity against the state-sponsored repression
that employs Pinochet-era methods and laws such
as the Anti-Terrorism Law. In Chile there is
debate over whether this legislation should be
applied in cases where property is threatened
(automobiles, tree plantations, etc.) but people are not.
Nearly 50 Mapuche prisoners populate the jails
because the state responds to land occupations
with massive reprisals against entire
communities. Several children were beaten,
together with their mothers, on Oct. 16, as
happens each time police forces enter the
communities of Ercilla and shoot
indiscriminately. That day the police got as far
as the Temucuicui School and began firing
pellets, leaving a dozen wounded and 30
suffocated, the majority children.11 That action
resulted in a reprimand from the International
Federation for Human Rights who joined the UN
Committee against Torture in their
recommendations released last May indicating that
the security forces should cease in their mistreatment of the Mapuche people.12
Convention 169: A Step Forward?
In September Convention 169 of the International
Labor Organization, that recognizes the rights of
indigenous peoples, went into effect. Chile was
the last country in South America with an
indigenous population to approve the legislation,
20 years late. It is interesting to note that the
governments that make up the Democratic Agreement
(Concertación Democratica) were always reluctant
to adopt legislation that was approved in 1991 in
Bolivia and Colombia, despite the fact that these
two countries were governed by conservative administrations at the time.
Bartolomé Clavero, a Spanish lawyer and historian
as well as a member of the UN Permanent Forum on
Indigenous Issues states in a recent article that
was published the same day that Convention 169
went into effect, "The government published,
without due consultation or consent of the
indigenous people, the Regulation that regulates
the consultation and participation of indigenous
peoples. It did this precisely, in view of its
content, to reverse mechanisms of control in future consultations."13
Clavero assures that the current UN special
rapporteur, James Anaya, engaged in an extensive
dialogue with the government warning that the
regulation of Convention 169 should be consulted
with the indigenous peoples. He adds that: "The
Regulation of Convention 169 is not the first
test of the bad faith, the first being when the
government of Chile insensibly made a great show
of its interest in indigenous population in its
relations with international human rights organizations."
In his opinion, the government is looking for "a
constitutional reform to recognize indigenous
peoples without recognizing their rights." This
is why he refers to "bad faith," as the
government recognizes something formally while
negating it through its actions. He concludes:
"The bad faith plays both sides of the issue,
against the indigenous population as well as the
international human rights institutions." In the
report following his trip to Chile, Special
Rapporteur James Anaya states he found "a
significant level of distrust, discontent, and
even the negation on the part of the indigenous
population of the plans, programs, and policies
of the government," which he attributes to the flawed official policies.14
If this is the language used by prestigious
international lawyers, one can imagine what the
Mapuche activists must feel when they confirm
that the government claims to recognize the
support from native peoples in the creation of
the Chilean nation but they deny that those
people have rights. "The repressive wave," points
out the website Mapuexpress.cl, is a curtain to
screen off that which they call a "constitutional
coup d'etat against the indigenous peoples and their rights."15
A New Generation
In this new cycle of struggles a new generation
has begun to intervene. This generation, as
pointed out by the daily La Segunda, "they are
armed with university degrees to defend the
indigenous cause."16 In the southern city of
Temuco alone, there are four self-managed dorms
with 220 students. They tend to study
anthropology, law, and journalism. During their
studies they rediscover Mapuche history. Among
other things, they learn that the so-called
"Pacification of the Araucanía," carried out by
the Republic in the late 19th century was a war
designed to exterminate their people.
Hand in hand with this new generation appear new
themes and concepts: the struggle to recuperate
land is waged to reconstruct the Mapuche
territory, or in other words, the "nation;" the
defense of autonomy, both from political parties
as well as on a general level from the Chilean
State; the fight not only to keep the culture
alive but rebuild themselves as a people
utilizing tools such as ancestral rights. It is
an urban generation, and although the movement
continues to maintain a strong rural component,
the city-based organizations are growing and
networking with other social movements.
They have built a wide network of digital, radio,
and press-based media, some from the external
Mapuche community, and have woven alliances with
civil society organizations like the NGO Citizen
Observatory (Observatorio Ciudadano) and many
others. Their demands are more and more political
and they formulate them in a new language:
"Restoration of the territoriality and autonomy
of the indigenous peoples of Chile;
Demilitarization of the territory; Withdrawal of
transnational corporations; Respect for the human
rights of the Mapuche people."17
They demonstrate an authentic devotion to the
study of history, as happens among all peoples
who recoup their dignity. The lonko Juan
Catrillanca from the emblematic community of
Temucuicui in Ercilla, and leader of the Mapuche
Territorial Alliance, assures that his
organization will continue to occupy private
property to ensure that the government continues
to transfer the land to them. The Alliance
invokes the Treaty of Tapihue, signed by the
Chilean State and the Mapuche people in 1825, to
respect the existing border of the time and
permit transit and commerce between the
inhabitants of Chile and Wallmapu (Mapuche Nation).
They maintain that this treaty was violated in
1881 when Chile Militarily invaded the Araucanía.
"We want to recuperate six million hectares.
Meanwhile, we will continue taking lands and we
will only defend ourselves with our wiños (wooden
clubs) and bolas," Cantrillanca said during a
presentation of the Alliance in August.18 As
pointed out by the historian Victor Toledo
Llancaqueo, they are making the change from
"lands in conflict" to "territories in conflict."19
End Notes
* Azkintuwe, Oct. 22, 2009.
* Idem.
* Chilean daily La Nación, Santiago, Oct. 26, 2009.
* Chilean daily La Nación, Oct. 26.
* Jorge Calbucura and Fabien Le Bonniec,
"Territorio y territorialidad en contexto
post-colonial," Ñuke Mapuföralget Working Papers No. 30, Chile, 2009.
* Idem.
* Idem, p. 20.
* Cited by Jorge Calbucura, p. 23.
* Idem, p. 117.
* Chilean daily La Nación, Oct. 13, 1009.
* Observatorio Ciudadano, ob. cit.
* Mapuexpress, Oct. 24, 2009.
* Bartolomé Clavero, ob. cit.
* James Anaya, ob. cit.
* Mapuexpresss, Nov. 3, 2009.
* La Segunda, Sep. 1, 2009 en
<http://www.lasegunda.com/>www.lasegunda.com.
* Convergence of Cultures (Convergencia de
las Culturas), Santiago, Oct. 23, 2009.
* Azkintuwe, Aug. 15, 2009.
* Víctor Toledo Llancaqueo, ob. cit. p. 103.
The land is a physical space used for production.
Territory is an integral space (physical,
cultural, religious, symbolic). Toledo defines it
as "a spatial continuum, a territory with its
water, species, and cultivatable lands, as well
as its right to participate in the decisions that
affect that territory. An imagined territory that
is superimposed on the real space of plantations
and the space designed by administrative limits
and that constitutes the identity to be reconstructed."
Translated for the Americas Program by Monica Wooters.
Raúl Zibechi is an international analyst for
Brecha of Montevideo, Uruguay, lecturer and
researcher on social movements at the
Multiversidad Franciscana de América Latina, and
adviser to several social groups. He writes the
monthly "Zibechi Report" for the Americas Program
(<http://www.americasprogram.org>www.americasprogram.org).
To reprint this article, please contact
<mailto:americas at ciponline.org>americas at ciponline.org.
Sources
"Alianza Territorial Mapuche, la nueva
organización que complica al gobierno," Azkintuwe, Aug. 15, 2009.
Bartolomé Clavero, "Convenio 169 y un reglamento
APRA cancelar derechos," Sep. 22, 2009, at:
<http://www.politicaspublicas.net/>www.politicaspublicas.net.
Center of Public Policy and Indigenous Rights
(Centro de Políticas Públicas y Derechos
Indígenas): <http://www.politicaspublicas.net/>www.politicaspublicas.net.
"C169 Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention,"
International Labor Organization, Geneva, 1989.
James Anaya, United Nations Special Rapporteur on
the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples, "Report on the
Situation of Indigenous Peoples in Chile,"
Special Rapporteur James Anaya, Oct. 5, 2009, at:
<http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,UNHRC,,,4ae5b9f02,0.html>http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,UNHRC,,,4ae5b9f02,0.html.
Jorge Calbucura and Fabien Le Bonniec,
"Territorio y territorialidad en contexto
post-colonial," Ñuke Mapuföralget Working Papers No. 30, Chile, 2009.
Citizen Obsevatory (Observatorio Ciudadano):
<http://www.observatorio.cl/>www.observatorio.cl.
Víctor Toledo Llancaqueo, "Pueblo mapuche.
Derechos colectivos y territorio," LOM, Santiago, 2006.
For More Information
Mapuche Websites
Azkintuwe: <http://www.azkintuwe.org/>www.azkintuwe.org/
Mapuexpress: <http://www.mapuexpress.net/>www.mapuexpress.net/
Meli Wixan Mapu: <http://meli.mapuches.org/>http://meli.mapuches.org/
Werken Williche (General Council of Wiliche
Caciques from Chiloé): <http://werken.williche.org/>http://werken.williche.org/
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20091117/608b205e/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list